Categories
Culture Food for Thought Principles

CV des Scheiterns

Die “Scheitern” Ausgabe des Neue Narrative Magazin startet mit den “CVs des Scheiterns” der Autor:innen. Dabei berichten Sebastian Klein, Laura Erler, Paul Fenski, Emma Marx, Taraneh Taheri und Dominik Wagner steckbriefartig über “Erfolglose Bewerbungen”, “Abbrüche & Kündigungen”, “Lücken”, “Fähigkeiten, die ich nicht habe” sowie “Sonstige Niederlagen”.

Ich hatte nach den ersten 7 Seiten Tränen der “Berührung” in den Augen. #connectedness sozusagen. Warum?

Als Unternehmer führe ich seit vielen Jahren (immer schon?) selbstorganisierten Teams. (Manche mögen “Führung” und “Selbstorganisation” als Widerspruch sehen – NEIN! – Aber das ist ein anderes Thema). Dabei habe ich Lauf der Zeit zum Einen tiefe Einblicke in das Leben vieler Menschen bekommen – und zum Anderen viel Kritik und Gegendruck von Investor:innen, Aufsichtsräten und Kollegen für meine Einstellung bekommen.

Beim Lesen dieser Scheitern-CVs wird das Bild der Menschen kompletter und die Trust vs. Performance Betrachtung wird kompletter. Was hat das mit Trust vs. Performance auf sich?

Simon Sinek hat da meine Philosophie auf den Punkt gebracht:

Simon Sinek über “Vertrauen” im Gegensatz zu “Fachlichem Können”

Ich fühle mich durch die Offenheit der CVs of Failure total in diesem Ansatz bestätigt. Und Failure – und Erfolg – das ist für viele nicht vereinbar bzw. ein Widerspruch. Aber darüber zu sprechen und das passieren zu lassen – Das ist für mich ein wesentlicher Anteil für das System “New Work”. Und es braucht noch viel mehr Unternehmer:innen die dafür einstehen und das auch offen sagen.

Failure – vor ca. 2,5 Jahren habe ich “mein” über 7 Jahre aufgebautes System – die Firma Crate.io verlassen und habe seither von aussen mitangesehen, wie es top-down in die komplett andere Richtung umgebaut wurde. Ich sage bewusst anders und nicht falsch. Unterschiedliche (Werte)-Vorstellungen mit dem Vorsitzenden des Aufsichtsrats waren damals der wesentliche Punkt für meinen Ausstieg. Denn ich sah mich nicht mehr in der Lage, mit dem neuen Leadership die Organisation weiterzuentwickeln und dahinterzustehen.

Ich wollte beweisen, dass ein fast-growth Deep-Tech Startup mit einem “Trust” Wertesystem und “New Work” Fehlerkultur kombinierbar ist.

2,5 Jahre später sind in der Organisation noch 3 von 65 Mitarbeiter:innen meines “Trusts” verblieben, davon niemand in einer Führungsposition. Der “Werte-Exorzismus” hat viele Menschen vertrieben und neue Werte haben andere Menschen angezogen. Das hat sehr viel Leid beschert und sehr viel Geld gekostet. Der Erfolgsbeweis ist bisher ausgeblieben.

Ist das mein Failure? Einen Elefanten geholt zu haben, diesen durch “meinen” Porzellanladen ziehen gelassen zu haben?

NEIN. Es ist lediglich eine Niederlage.


Mein CV of failures

Erfolglose Bewerbungen

Ich habe mich als CTO beim Digital-Spinoff (“new mobility”) eines führenden Automobilherstellers beworben. Ich habe mir das lange überlegt und dachte, dass ich da echten Impact haben kann und geile Software auf einem breiten Scale mit viel Umweltimpact bauen kann. Und Deutschland Tesla die Stirn bieten kann. Aber ich wurde nichtmal für ein Interview eingeladen. Das hat mich in meiner Selbstsicherheit etwas geknickt 🙂

Von den 2-3 Situationen in meinem Leben wo ich mich für eine Stelle beworben habe (ehrlich gesagt waren das nur Ferialjobs) war das die einzige Bewerbung in meinem Leben die nicht geklappt hat. Ansonsten war ich immer selbständig.

Abbrüche und Kündigungen

Siehe Text oben. Das war definitiv bitter, 7 Jahre Herzblut zu investieren, also quasi ein Viertel meines Arbeitslebens. Und dann die Kontrolle zu verlieren und gegenseitig zu kündigen.

Ein weiterer Abbruch – weiter zurückliegend – war meine Promotion. Ich hätte noch ca. 6 Monate durchhalten müssen und die finale Defensio vorbereiten und halten müssen, aber habs hingeschmissen. Das bereue ich manchmal ein bisschen. Aber eigentlich nur in Momenten wo ich etwas prahlen möchte :).

Lücken

Während dem Studium bin ichs verhältnismässig locker angegangen. Meine Frau war um 8:00 im Büro und hat das Geld verdient, ich habe ausgiebig geschlafen und auch zwischendurch mal nach der Prüfung Faxe-Dosen am Vormittag im Park gezischt.

Auch im Jahr nach meinem Crate-Ausstieg hab ich Zeit zur Verarbeitung gebraucht, mir Zeit zur Vorbereitung der Zukunft genommen, und von Ersparnissen und Arbeitslosengeld gelebt.

Fähigkeiten die ich nicht habe

Geduld: Ich glaube, dass ich recht geduldig bin. Bin ich aber nicht. Sagt mir auch mein Umfeld. Klassischer Fail von Selbstwahrnehmung und Fremdwahrnehmung. Häng aber auch davon ab, wie ausgeglichen ich bin. #sport #meditation

Anpassungsfähigkeit: Würde an der einen oder anderen Stelle für weniger Reibung sorgen. Ich bin aber auch (noch) nicht bereit, das loszulassen. Weil ich glaube, das brauchts auch manchmal als Unternehmer. Wobei ich “eigentlich” selber weiss, dass das Geheimnis die richtige Balance wäre. #zen

Strukturiertheit: Ich brauche wenig Struktur und kann gut komplexe Dinge in meinem Kopf zusammenhalten. Im zusammenleben/arbeiten mit Anderen, wäre das jedoch manchmal für meine Mitmenschen angenehmer, wenn sie mehr Struktur an der Schnittstelle hätten.

Sonstige Niederlagen

Eine erwähnenswerte sonstige Niederlage ist vor ca. 15 Jahren passiert. Ich habe – u.A. durch nicht-funktionaler Verhaltensweise, Ego, Sturheit meinerseits – große Zukunftspotentiale meiner damaligen Firma nicht genutzt, bzw. diese weggeschmissen. Da muss ich immer wieder aufpassen, dass ich nicht “aus Prinzip” handle und die richtige Balance zwischen “Business machen” und “Recht haben” wähle.


Was meint ihr dazu? Ich freue mich über eine Diskussion auf dem Linkedin-Post!

Categories
Culture Entrepreneurship Principles

Why people quit

I received some feedback and questions about my post on leadership decisions at a workplace, and why I believe that many societal and political topics don’t belong to my workplace. (A clarifying side note: I wasn’t saying Basecamp is right or wrong. And banning and forbidding speech is a bad idea in general).

I’ve been chewing parts of this post for a while. But as about one third of the Basecamp workforce left after their leaders Jason/David announced some cultural changes and today Melinda and Bill Gates announced their separation, it was time to push it out.

All of these separations really moved me and over the weekend I spent several hours in reading and researching. It moved me because I can personally relate to that very well. In November I left my previous company (~60 employees like Basecamp) and over the last few month ~25 people – of which most of them I hired personally – left the company too.

(Just to be clear and explicit: I’m not making hints, propose conclusions or draw any parallels to my former company or people involved there. This is rather based being a curious, learning entrepreneur for 30years).

It was the right decision

Companies and their leaders have the right and duty to make decisions. To set their leadership style and their culture. To change it gradually, radically or not at all. And to take the consequences. This isn’t good or bad per se. This is just how it is and how it has to be.

At the point a decision is taken (“Culture Changes”/”Quitting the Job”) – it was the right decision for the corresponding party. At the very moment to decide, everybody will take the best decision this person can take, based on the (limited) facts available.

Software engineers in the tech space are well paid (in Basecamp’s case ~220k/year, paying at the top 10% of San Francisco market rate and will receive up to 6 month of salary if they decide to leave). So they can also decide freely if they want to stay and adopt to the new situation/culture or if they want to move on. It’s also very unlikely they have to pee in bottles while driving delivery trucks or being in physical danger. So it’s pretty safe to assume:

People don’t quit a job, they quit a boss.

It’s a common saying, but i don’t fully agree.

(Among the many articles I read, this HBR article reflected my view best, I’m partially paraphrasing it. Also “What you do is who you are (Summary)” by Ben Horowitz inspired me a lot).

Strong companies are built around strong cultures. And they will be highly individual, but they will share a couple of patterns. Often they are built around the leaders that craft them. I bet you’ve seen this comic:

This comic has been floating around the internet for a couple of years

Organisations need structure and leadership. This is a good thing and isn’t contradictory to self-organisation, empowerment of the individuals,… Modern leadership styles/principles fully embrace that. I’m stressing that because I strongly believe that so much of a happy/fulfilled workplace is dependent on that connection.

Changing culture

It’s as simple as that. Different cultures attract different people. Sometimes leadership changes, and therefore a change of talent follows. Or culture starts drifting away and gets recalibrated, which results in churn.

Nothing to worry about. just to be aware of.

Missing Joy

As leader you need to know what employees enjoy. Where a person can work at their best. People aren’t resources that are slotted into a position. Remember, we spend a good portion of our time awake at work. We need to support everybody to craft their optimal experience at work.

You need to design around them. If people are engaged and come to that energized state that is named flow, magic happens. And magic results are just magic! This is only possible if people are in a safe space, where they don’t have to worry about many things. Without trust a safe space can’t exist. But how to create trust (Yes, mistrust leads to people quitting their jobs)?

Shrinking Trust

Strong cultures are memorable and based on a set of rules. The simpler and more explicit they are, the better. Because if you’re operating on these set of principles reliably it creates trust. An additional benefit of trust is that it makes communication way more effective. Because, if you don’t trust me, all my talking would be useless.

A few of my personal rules that randomly come to my mind: “I do what I say, I say what I do”, “I communicate decisions, as soon as they are taken and don’t hide them.”, “In case of mistakes I’m focussing on avoiding it in future, not on finding who’s guilt it was.”, or to close that heading “Assume every decision is right, as you assume best intentions.”…

Never forget: It’s hard to earn trust and takes time. It’s easy to destroy trust and takes no time.

Lack of Appreciation

A healthy company has a good, diverse mix of individuals. The doers, introverts, fighters, dreamers, caretakers, listeners, thinkers, tinkerers, silent ones, critics,… As leader I often felt like a Zoo director.

The animals in the forest (from MyToys Puzzle)

Assume everybody is doing her/his best. All the time. Therefore everybody deserves their share of appreciation and attention. A “small beaver” can be equally important to a “big roaring tiger” but will leave if he’s not seen and appreciated. No matter how long an employee is with the company, or how important their role is.

Lack of growth perspective

Bill and Melinda Gates separated after 27 years of marriage because they “no longer believe they can grow together as a couple”.
So, if an employee is asking: “What is my perspective at the company?”, you already missed the point of proactively managing that. If these answers are missing, one will sooner or later quit. On the other hand – providing a clear growth path can do wonders!


As Leader, don’t delegate diversity and inclusion. It’s your job. As soon you reach a point, where DEI is done for it’s own purpose you lost the connection to the company culture and this leads to dissatisfaction.

There are assholes out there. They might be inside your company. Manage them well. Recognise that you won’t be able to change them. Make sure they do as little damage as possible. As long you have the power. Don’t look away, act.

People don’t leave companies, they leave people.

Paraphrased from Ben Horowitz’ Book

Oh, btw. I’m about to put together a new team as we speak.

People don’t join companies, they choose the people to work with.

Mail me or call me if you’re ready to make a choice.

Categories
Crate Culture Entrepreneurship

How to Crate

Hi, welcome to the team. I’m so glad you are here at Crate. You’re now a Cratie!

Crate.io‘s mascots: goats

You’ll need at least one cycle to figure this place out. Maybe even two cycles. That’s totally o.k. – take your time. Uh? a cycle? What’s that? Let’s call it 1-2 quarters (of a year) for now.
When entering a new environment, the first impression is really important. And we’re working hard to make the first experience a good one. But as we’re a bunch of curious, different and complex people solving complex problems this will take some time. Btw. complex is still better than complicated1.
Be curious, meet everyone, look around, ask all the questions, write and talk to whomever you want. I bet there are many new acronyms, habits and rituals to learn. This will time until you’re fully productive. We expect that. In case you feel unsafe or don’t dare to ask someone, you have multiple fallbacks: your onboarding buddy, your lead person or just me.

Company culture is reflecting the people working there. What you do is who you are2. It started based on the belief of the two founders – Christian and me. Over the last 6 years we kept a lot of principles, but also carefully changed others.
The following paragraphs are a user guide to navigate Crate and navigate it. It captures what you can expect out of working as part of the team, our aspirations and the leadership values that influence our culture.

My intent is to accelerate the working relationship between all of us with this document.

Our Average Week

People work from where they want and when they want. It might seem this is less efficient than having all people at one place for fixed hours. But we’ve deliberatly decided to craft a remote-friendly culture that even allows people in different timezones to be included. It makes us resilient and adaptable. It is sustainable. We’ll do as many things asynchronously and in written format as possible. People working in one of the offices have the advantage of meet at the espresso machine – and have random chats. But even if you are remote or in a different office you will be able to see and talk with your team mates at least once per day: During the daily coffee – a video call that the team does once a day. This call is about social interaction, staying connected and getting better known to each other. The teams decide themselves how to organize the rest of the work and agile methodology. One nice weekly ritual worth mentioning for the people sharing a location is the weekly team lunch – we cook something together in Dornbirn and invite you to go for lunch in other locations.

It’s up to you and your lead to agree on a schedule to set expectations, about cadence and structure/tools of 1:1s and related topics.

We have a bi-weekly all-hands meeting (attendance optional) where the leadership will present a summary about what’s going on in the different areas of the business and is also open to questions. The meeting is also recorded in case you can’t attend.

You can contact the founders 24hours a day. Don’t worry. We’re used to that and have tuned the notifications of our phones and other tools in a way that is in harmony with our private life. If we don’t want to be disturbed we’ll manage to not be disturbed.

If one of us is traveling, out of office, ill or on vacation, we update our status beforehand in Pingboard3. All our meetings still occur albeit with time zone considerations.

Some of us work now and then on weekends, evenings or early mornings. Some start later, some leave earlier. This is their choice. We do not expect that you are going to work on the weekend, evenings or early mornings. We might be sending mails and Slack messages, but unless the thing says URGENT, it can always wait until work begins for you on Monday.
It’s up to you to find your work/life balance, be an integrated part of a team that delivers results. We’ll help you to do so.

We all take vacations. You should, too. Disconnected from work is when we do some of the best work.

North Star Principles

Simply Sustainable takes a major concern and common claim – simplicity – and qualifies with the ultimate payoff: sustainability, an application and a business that can scale and maintain itself ad infinitum.
It’s forward looking – in a world of data overload, this is how we do more than survive: it’s how we thrive.
Sustainability demands balance, playing well with others, moving forward with peace of mind. And who doesn’t want it to be simple??

Crate is a team of passionate, experienced people who’ve crafted a bold and clever database for the fast, data-intensive world, making speed, scalability super simple, open, and accessible – a solution that’s built to be sustainable for all.

Crate.io Brand Story

Clever. We’re passionate people with a love of technology and a lot of experience. But technologic breakthroughs don’t just come from knowing your stuff. They come from looking at things from different angles and flipping the situation around: they come from being clever.

Bold. We believe in being bold, in the power of having a vision and the gumption to realize it, however radical. Being bold means seeing the big picture and believing you can impact it, shape it, make it better.

Open. The best solutions come from people listening to each other as they share information, insight, and experience. Which is why we are fanatically open and honest — listening to our customers, being good citizens of the open source community, building with others to make solutions better.

Simple. It takes a deep understanding of the craft, coupled with human empathy, to render the complex simple. To make it accessible for all. In everything we do, from how we configure data and integration with existing systems to user dashboards, documentation, and support, we aim to keep it all super simple. Because data should work for everyone.

Sustainable. We believe the best solutions are sustainable, supporting communities and businesses as they grow. Which is why we believe in working together, building on each other’s advances, all in order to create open and accessible solutions that are sustainable for all.

Crate.io Brand Pillars

Our System Of Values

Our Values are the guiding principles that lead to what we do on a daily basis. They are the parameters that tune our decision process that results in how we behave if no one watches. This is what we call culture.
You can rely on those values, and you can demand them at any time.

Meaningfulness. At any time we offer to explain the meaningfulness and relationale of tasks, goals and measures.

Success. We strive towards and celebrate joint success.

Colleguality. We offer a work environment based on collaboration and cooperation. At the same time we respect everyone’s individuality.

Esteem. We appreciate and respect each and everyone and their opinions and provide open and honest feedback.

Challenge. It is our aspiration to provide everyone with the opportunity to grow by taking on new and challenging tasks.

Self-determination. There is as much room for self-determination as possible.

Joy. By Living Our Values above we gain happiness and satisfaction.

Expectations and Feedback Protocol

We firmly believe that the process of setting, expressing and matching expectations is at the core of building trust and respect in a team. This requires the continuous process of giving and receiving feedback.

At Crate.io, there is a formal feedback cycle which occurs twice a year. We have outlined the structure of an appraisal interview in a separate document.

Meeting Protocol

Meetings take time, we take care about our mutual time. Therfor we have a couple of principles for our meetings. First of all we deliberately run our calendars publicly visible. If you have a question about any meeting on any calendar, just ask. If a meeting is private or confidential, you’ll most likely just see a placeholder. The vast majority of meetings are neither private nor confidential.

Each meeting has to include an agenda and/or intended purpose, the appropriate amount of productive attendees, and the expected contribution of the parties invited. If Craties are attending a meeting, they prefer starting on time. If Craties are running a meeting, they will start that meeting on time. If it’s not clear to a Cratie why they are in a meeting, they will ask for clarification on their attendance.

If you send a presentation deck a reasonable amount of time before a meeting, we will read it before the meeting and will have our questions ready. If we haven’t read the deck, we will tell you.

If a meeting completes its intended purpose before it’s scheduled to end, let’s give the time back to everyone. If it’s clear the intended goal won’t be achieved in the allotted time, let’s stop the meeting before time is up and determine how to finish the meeting later.

Nuances (and Errata)

Being a diverse team is a priceless advantage. Because tolerance creates creativity. And creativity is the most precious ingredient of the future. It’s essential to have different personalities in a team. We embrace this fact – but also move out of comfort zone when needed.

One possible model: The Myers-Briggs Personality Types, by Jake Beach, via Wikpedia

We don’t put people into boxes. But to concern oneself with different scientific models helps us to work better together.

We always assume positive intent for all involved. Whenever a person takes a decision, it’s the best decision that he/she can take in that moment.

If someone of us is on the phone during a meeting for more than 30 seconds, say something. It’s easy to get distracted nowadays.

This document is a first braindump of myself – speaking as one of the founders and CTO. This is not my creation, but I was privileged to work as part of a system of people that shaped our culture and my thinking.
When I came across Rands in repose article „How To Rands“, I decided to take this as template, rework it and use as basis for a wider discussion within the Crate.io Team, but also the public.

I would like to update it with you, make it a shared thing all of us can underwrite, and therefor would appreciate your feedback. I‘ll turn this into a Github document in case we need to improve tooling to collaboratively work on that document.

[1] The Zen of Python

[2] What you do is who you are, by Ben Horowitz

[3] Pingboard


Full disclosure: This post was heavily inspired by Rands in repose article “How To Rands”.